Elections – Appropriate Candidates Selected Through Verdict of the People



The process of elections is very simple since a qualified mass of individuals are given the opportunity to elect their representative to a public office. This is one of the oldest processes where every individual in continuance of his right to vote, can decide on the selection of his or her candidate. The decision is again based on the candidate’s personal profile, which highlights the various achievements and successes he or she has had in the past. The work done by the candidate for the masses also play a significant role in deciding who will be holding the specific post in public office.

The mechanism of elections is very simple. There are no hard and fast rules that govern an election except the following:

1. To vote the electorate must be qualified to cast the vote and
2. The candidate must meet the minimum criteria that are required to qualify him for the desired post.

A day is decided on which the elections are held. Before the Election Day the candidates are required to submit their nominations to the election authority that studies the nominations and finally approves the candidates. If a specific nomination is rejected, the candidate cannot stand for the election. The actual process is set in motion once the nominations are accepted. The candidates put up huge banners and distribute little pamphlets stating their achievements in their respective areas of operation.

Where this is not the requirement, the candidate advertises his or her experience in the desired field and the strategy that he or she will follow to achieve the targets and the expectations of the people. It must be kept in mind here that the electorate takes the final decision and that they are far better knowledgeable than the candidate, so flashy messages and false achievements will fall flat the moment they are displayed.

A ballot paper is generally used in elections where a list of all the candidates to the post is printed with their respective emblem or signage. The electorate will have to choose the candidate of preference by putting the voting seal against the name of the candidate.

A similar process is generally followed in the election of a circuit judge. The judge is elected from a list of other eligible judges after the normal qualifying rounds are completed. The short campaigns run by the judges help the electorate select the candidate for the coveted post.

Tagged , ,

Conservative Leader, George W Bush – A Man of Principle



As George Bush nears the end of his presidency, it is time to think of his contributions. His successful war against terror is the greatest gift to America that President Bush could have given us.

Today, the world is threatened by Terrorists. To these fanatics, the battle cry is, “Death to all Infidels,” and their aim is to eradicate all Jews, all Christians, all other major religions of the world, even other Muslims—anyone who does not accept the Terrorists’ twisted view of the Islam religion. Terrorists protect no border; they wear no uniform, and they have no country, no loyalty to a form of government, nothing but a life of terror, hate, and death. Today, they have active groups in every country on earth. They inhabit lands of others like leeches on the land, like worms infesting a dog. Terrorists gain power under vastly different governmental forms by deceit, fear, and terror or the threat of terror. Their aim is to destroy the people of the land in which they live, so as to destroy infidels throughout the entire world. Somewhere in the span of time, they have lost their humanity.

These Terrorists are an absolute threat to the stability of today’s world. There are many terrorist groups world wide, wreaking havoc in many countries. So far, the terrorist groups have not united, but heaven help the world if they do.

Bush successfully kept America safe from further terrorist attacks after 9/11. In spite of excoriating criticism from a liberal press and liberal politicians, Bush stayed true to his goal of a safe America, and succeeded. He did so with the help of Congress passing several anti-terrorist laws. Most of these laws have been upheld by the United States Court Systems, often going clear to the Supreme Court. There is good evidence that without these laws, America would have been attacked numerous times in the last seven years. But all of these attacks were discovered prior to the attack date, and thwarted.

In spite of all these facts, Bush has been demonized and condemned as worse than Hitler, a greater terrorist than Bin Laden, the biggest threat to America today. Ridiculous! The greatest threat to America right now is Global Terrorism, not our own president. Bush stayed firm to his principles, his basic concern for America’s safety, and his continual, steadfast belief that his main job was to keep America safe. He never flinched, as President Clinton often did, at the criticism heaped on him. This just seemed to roll off his back, because he saw his mission clear. A lesser man would have abandoned his core beliefs for popularity. Thank you from the bottom of my heart, President Bush. I not only think you are a great president, but also a great man of honor. God Bless You. You kept our country safe.

Tagged , ,

Why I Am A Conservative



First, let us start with the dictionary definition of conserve: to keep from being damaged, lost or wasted; to save keep, or preserve. In politics, a conservative is defined as someone tending to conserve or preserve established traditions or institutions.

Now let us ask a leading question. Is it worthwhile to conserve or be a conservative? George Santayana, Spanish-American poet and teacher of philosophy at Harvard University, wrote in his book Reason in Common Sense: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

I am a child of the Great Depression – oldest child of a mother set adrift in that economic disaster with three youngsters. One week we lived on a peck of dried peas – morning, noon and night – which my mother, in great humiliation, obtained from the government surplus food depot.

I mention these painful, personal memories so that you will understand I am not unmindful of the hardships of poverty and circumstance, or the role of government in mitigating disaster.

I cast my first vote for Franklin Delano Roosevelt – believing then, and still today – that government has a responsibility to “prime the pump” in great emergencies.

Unfortunately, when Democrats discovered the vote – getting power of free, social services, they would not return to the requirement of individual responsibilities. In 1951, while lunching at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., President Truman and his press secretary came in and took stools at the bar next to our table. After sandwich and soup, the president turned and said hello to my host. With this we engaged the president in conversation.

That morning, a headline on the front page of the “Washington Post” was — “Inflation Hits 3 percent.” None of us in the group had ever heard of inflation. So I said, “Mr. President, excuse my ignorance, but what is inflation?

Mr. Truman smiled and replied, “Don’t apologize. I was asked that same question at the cabinet meeting this morning. I explained it was like a hunter stung by a bee — and here he told a locker-room joke, the gist of which was the hunter’s desire for a salve that would remove the sting but leave the swelling.

I laughed, but I realized he was deliberately pumping up inflation for political gain – by running the printing presses overtime at the Bureau of Engraving.

Truman already had confiscated the real cash in the Social Security Insurance Fund to help pay for World War II, replacing the insurance reserve with I.O.U s. Thus, the hedge against old age retirement ceased being insurance and became a “trust.” Some of you may recall the liberal argument: “There is nothing to worry about. We owe it to ourselves.”

I became alarmed, because common sense told me that Social Security, and even the nation, would go bankrupt if inflation – at 1 percent, or whatever – continued indefinitely. That’s when I became a conservative.

When Social Security approached its first short-fall in the early sixties, I wrote a column warning about the impending crisis. The amount of angry response by readers, including some close friends who should have grasped the facts, astonished me. I was called irresponsible for suggesting that Social Security was in trouble.

However, the Washington politicians fessed up a year later and raised the employee/employer Social Security taxes for the first time. Such increases have occurred periodically every since. Another is needed right now, as is Medicare and Medicaid.

The critical problem is that working-and-saving Americans now must cough up to government – federal, state, and local – at least a third of what they earn. I am a student of history, and I have learned that all previous civilizations have collapsed when approximately 40 percent of the fruits of producers go to support non-producers – government functionaries being the largest non-productive consumers.

We are closer to the edge than our politicians like to admit. In our time, the Soviet Union slipped over the edge. The Communist Manifesto – “to each according to need, from each according to ability” – has a wonderful, compassionate ring. But socialism always has been a nation-killer, and liberalism is nothing more than slow-motion socialism.

The United States national debt is 5 and 1/2 trillion dollars. Interest on this debt takes the top 35 percent of federal taxes. Social services that the borrowed money provided has been consumed and forgotten.

If we balanced the federal budget next year, and every year forever, we would never escape the 35 percent overburden on our federal revenue without repudiating the debt, or confiscating your and my savings by drastic devaluation of our money.

Don’t laugh! President Nixon did it overnight in a small way. Mexico and Russia did it last year big time. Inflation does it more slowly, but just as surely. How much did you pay for your last home or car that 20 years ago cost one-fourth as much?

We must move on from balancing the budget and start working earnestly toward reducing the national debt. It’s the economy, stupid.

After the economy, the principal problems plaguing the nation center around the liberal dissipation of established traditions and institutions.

We have destroyed the family and the work ethic with no-questions-asked welfare, encouragement of out-of-wedlock teen-age pregnancies with free condoms in school and welfare after delivery that rewards the disappearance of impregnators We have dumbed down education with the hope of keeping kids in school – but, still, the drop-out rate in inner-city schools is 45 percent and unemployment of young, black males is 55 percent. A lost generation.

Pornography and gutter language is common on prime- time television. Teen-age drug addiction is soaring. Street violence is commonplace.

Liberals laugh at morality, family values, religious faith, hard work, high educational standards, courtesy, patriotism, chaste sexual conduct, individual responsibility, pre-marital abstinence, polite language.

To conserve, one has to be smart enough to know what to keep and preserve from 10,000 years of civilization, so we don’t keep repeating grievous mistakes. Our nation, our culture, our civilization depends on conservatism – either to save what is good and workable, or to rescue us from anarchy when the nation goes belly up.

I close by recommending the “Serenity Prayer” delivered at the height of the Great Depression – by Reinhold Niebuhr, the famous American clergyman:

“God grant us the courage to change things we can, accept the things we cannot, and the wisdom to know the difference.”

September 25, 1996

Click here to see this article on Lindsey Williams’s website

Tagged , ,